<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Java - Performance of File Reading</title>
	<link>http://twit88.com/blog/2008/02/06/java-performance-of-file-reading/</link>
	<description>Good judgement comes from experience, and experience comes from bad judgement.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 20:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: tejinder</title>
		<link>http://twit88.com/blog/2008/02/06/java-performance-of-file-reading/#comment-8202</link>
		<dc:creator>tejinder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 06:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://twit88.com/blog/2008/02/06/java-performance-of-file-reading/#comment-8202</guid>
		<description>But if you change the order of method call in main method. i.e. first call fp.testWithBuffer and then after call fp.testWithoutBuffer, you'll get opposite result. Wich ever method you call first, will take less time. It just just becouse disk pointer are already set before second method call.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But if you change the order of method call in main method. i.e. first call fp.testWithBuffer and then after call fp.testWithoutBuffer, you&#8217;ll get opposite result. Wich ever method you call first, will take less time. It just just becouse disk pointer are already set before second method call.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
